Good maybe ill see you there. Me and the boss will be there tomorrow. I have ha passes also an want to try out the new lens. 70 200 I bought. Muttley Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone ----- Reply message ----- From: "Ray Buck" <rbuck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, May 30, 2010 12:05 pm Subject: [ratpack] Re: Blew my own mind To: <ratpack@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Yeah. Photo.net. It's almost as bad as usenet. Back in the day, I used a lotta Tri-X, but I've been told and read that Fuji's Velvia. I dunno about Ilford current offerings, but I DO remember when they brought out their 800 ASA stuff. I couldn't wait to get my hands on some. Man, was that early stuff grainy or what? I've gone the rounds with the cheap photo processors. I'll take mine to Borg-Andersen and pay a little more to have it done right. I took one roll of KodaColor (I think that's what it's called now) to a local quickie processing outlet and asked to have the images on a CD. They told me that the way they did that was to process the film as prints, then scan 'em into digital form. Uhhh....no thanks. I was gonna be out at the track today but I've got a case of the "zacklies." I feel zackly like shit. I just watched the Turkish GP on the DVR and Indy is recording now, then NASCAR Coke 600 at Charlotte. I think I'll be able to rest for the day. :) Gonna try to make it out tomorrow. I've got a general admission ticket and I'm hoping that'll give me access to a coupla places to shoot from. I called and was told that the GA ticket included a "pit pass" (paddock access for the road racers.) We'll see. 2 years ago I got what was to me a mind-blowing shot of Noriyuki Haga... ....as he was riding a pit scooter after breaking his collarbone in a qualifying accident. I dunno if ya remember, but he raced with the broken bone(s), finished 6th (I think) in the first race, then crashed again in the 2nd. He called it quits for the day after that. r Sent from my Dreadnought using that barely tolerable Thunderbird email program On 5/27/2010 8:59 AM, humminboid@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > O Yeh...a lot of the forums (fora??) have a group of so-called > "experts", > and some are quite good... giving advice like it was > actually worth > something, and otherwise reinforcing their particuar > prejudices. Photo.net > is the worst, imo. There are a few, however, > The Nikon Cafe, and > Nikonians, which are more user friendly, and > actually friendly, too. Don't > ask a question regarding third party > equipment (Tamron, Sigma, Sunpak) on > Nikonians, tho. (with hauteur) > "/Really/, Old Boy, /none/ of us here have > had much experience with > third party equipment!" Other than that, a great > bunch. Dunno about > Canon sites, tho. > > The "Old Technology" still lasts forever, and works a treat! And > doesn't > need a damn computer to translate your eye into reality. I've > been > considering buying a Nikon F 100, just for "old time's sake. You > can get > some of the classic lenses for Nikon or Canon for a song off > daBay, but you > do have to watch out for the sharpies. All of my > lenses would fit, and > film, while expen$ive compared to free pixels, > can be converted to > electronic media for just a few $ at the time of > processing. Just be sure > your 18 1/2 year old "processing > professional" understands the process, > and doesn't faint at the > suggestion that C-41 processing /IS designed /for > modern chromogenic > black and white films like Ilford XP, and the Kodak > films. The Kodak > offerings are, or at least the last time I tried them, > were not on