01.07.2011, 16:38, "Lokkerbol, Cliff" <lokkerbolc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Sorry to repost but has anyone got any ideas to this issue? Is this something > being looked at in 0.19.6 release? There's a chance, that this situation is not a bug specific to 0.19.5. I need more information about the case. Which version did you use before the upgrade? If that was 0.19.3 or 0.19.4, could you attempt a rollback and confirm, that object type SELECT is in place there and the form works as expected? Thanks. -- Denis Ovsienko