Hi,
i'm still investigating the possibillity of implementing a
Worker/SharedWorker interface.
A short question:
While browsing the code, i stumbled on a a possible API
kwirk/inconsistency..
When defining a native class, I'll do that for the JSRuntime. Setting
the prototype object, I'll have to create a new Object, which has to be
done on the JSContext.
Is that intentional?
So that each context using a native class will create its own class
instance, having its own unique class_id, the class definition belonging
to the runtime (important for malloc/free and gc) and the prototype
belonging to the context (important for object behavior in context) ?
greets
maG
-- snip --
JSClassID clsid;
JSClassDef clsdef = {
"NewClass", .finalizer=[..], .gc_mark=[..], .call=[..]
};
JS_NewClassID(&clsid);
JS_NewClass(rt, clsid, &clsdef);
JSValue proto = JS_NewObject(ctx);
[...JS_SetPropertyFunctionList( .. )]
JS_SetClassProto(ctx, clsid, proto);
-- snap --
