Pierrick, we need to see if you can't just leverage our protable BLAS wrapper from NT2 directly. On 25/03/2015 19:31, Pierrick Brunet wrote: > Hi Valerio, > > It is great to see Pythran used that way and thanks for these kind of > feed back. > > About numpy.dot, only the vec * vec implementation exists for now but it > is planned to add this with the numpy.linalg package. > > To get around this problem, we will be really happy if you want to add > this implementation in Pythran :-) > Otherwise, I may have a look at this tomorrow for, at least, a "slow" > implementation for compatibility. > If you want to test it now. I suggest you to implement this function in > you Python module (using Python) and Pythran will convert it for you. > > Cheers, > Pierrick > > On 25/03/2015 19:10, Valerio De Carolis wrote: >> Dear Serge, >> >> I'm using Pythran since a while and used for several research projects. >> >> Now I was trying to update a bigger project under pythran but I'm >> getting several errors as soon as I encounter matrix multiplications. >> >> As you know NumPy is quite messy with the semantics so I'll write an >> example: >> >>> import numpy as np >>> >>> #pythran export test_func(float[][], float[]) >>> def test_func(A, b): >>> return np.dot(A, b) >> >> This is supposed to be the product among a 2-dim ndarray and a 1-dim >> ndarray, the classical (N x M) * (M x 1) multiplication case that >> other fellow researchers used in their numpy code. >> >> Now this is failing to compile because there is no such implementation >> in the dot.hpp file. >> >> Do you know if such feature is planned or if there is a way of getting >> around this problem? I also tried casting to the numpy.matrix() type >> but I've seen the repo code that is still a missing feature. >> >> Thanks for the help. >> >> Cheers, >> Valerio >> >> >> > >