Hi All, Yes, let us limit ourselves to FWD and pivot turning mechanism, and leave RWD aside on its own. Tadpole front wheels can be covered by the front shell piece / fairing, while delta rear wheels cannot be covered by the sharp tail of a streamlined shell. With a differential, in case one tadpole wheel slips, the other wheel can keep going. Plus tadpole wheels can be placed closer to COG for more traction than delta wheel, especially with bigger wheels / shorter riders. I am wondering if term "reverse trike" should be clarified as FWD tadpole is like a reversed FWD delta, and vice versa with RWD tadpole and FWD delta... Yes, steering/braking is complicated with load/speed involved, and may be just as difficult to build as FWD differential. Regarding control, I am hopping that steering 2 wheels with my feet would be easier than 1 delta wheel. Theoretically more may be better, but practically less may be more? Thanks for the design primer pdf. Vi >________________________________ >From: Patrick van Gompel <patrick_van_gompel@xxxxxxxxxxx> >To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Sent: Sunday, September 4, 2011 11:33 AM >Subject: [python] Re: Why a Tadpole? > > > >Interesting discussion. >Probably you guys know, but I found this document very usefull for trike setup >comparisons, steering angles and other stuff: >http://www.hellbentcycles.com/trike_projects/Recumbent%20Trike%20Design%20Primer.pdf > >I was wondering this statement too: "With 2 front wheels >driving/steering/braking, we should get more traction/control/stopping power." >-Not sure why 2 front wheels give better control. If you have all the right >angles for both wheels it might, but if you have not, it probably makes things >worse. >-Nowadays any decent brake has more than enough power to stop the wheel. So >having two front brakes instead of one wouldn't make much difference. What >does matter is where you CoG is positioned. Usually it is easier to flip over >the two front wheels of a tadpole than over the one more foward placed front >wheel of a delta. And, having one front brake is less complicated than having >two. A lot of tadpoles seem to suffer from 'brake turning' (or what is the >proper word?). > >Gerald, there is another thing to consider (your last point). Although your >legs bent to the inside of the bent, your front wheel contact point goes to >the inside as well. So your CoG might actually move to the outside of the >bent. Of course that depends on the construction of your bike and the rider. > >Patrick > > > >________________________________ >From: bepb@xxxxxx >To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Date: Sun, 4 Sep 2011 19:48:40 +0200 >Subject: [python] AW: Re: Why a Tadpole? > > >Hi Vi, >there is a strong point in the curiosity, no question. Its been the reason I >have been thinking about a tadpole python myself. > >The shell for the delta somehow need to adapt to the bending off the trike, >but in which way could a tadpole python solve this issue? > >Concerning driving I dont see where the FWD tadpole has an inherent advantage. >The additional contact area will be nullified by the less load per area for >breaking and driving. > > >I like the considerations about the placement off the solar pannel. In my >case, I should place the panel on the back. I generaly drive in westery >directions in the morning and easterly coming home from work in the evening. > >There are some sources comparing tadpole vs delta on the net, but they seem to >have in common that they focus on LWB deltas vs SWB tadpoles. >But there are some huge differences between a python delta and a LWB delta. >*On python trikes, the load is significant more on the front wheel. You need >this to avoid wheel slip. >*I dont think that there is need to have the CoG (Center of Gravity) any >higher than with a tadpole. >*On the python trike, the frontwheel actually tilts because off the pivot >angle 0~50*. >*Since the steering involves moving the legs to the inside off the bent, >weight distribution should improve, certainly over the LWB delta, most >propbly also over the tadpole. >Maybe we need a python trike based comparison? > > > >Gerald > >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > >Von: Vi Vuong <vi_vuong@xxxxxxxxx> >>An: "python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>Gesendet: So., 04. Sep 2011, 06:13:58 GMT+00:00 >>Betreff: [python] Re: Why a Tadpole? >> >> >> >> >>Hi Gerald, >> >> >>With 2 front wheels driving/steering/braking, we should get more >>traction/control/stopping power. Tadpole also fits nicely in a standard >>streamlined shell, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jETRur5Bf58, but it should >>be possible to achieve similar level of aerodynamics with advanced shell >>design for a delta... >> >> >>According to Lightfootcycles, the name tadpole came from the "wiggling" >>caused by leg movements, similar to python PSI? They also have a long >>pros/cons list, but seem to favor delta trikes (that they make) >>http://www.lightfootcycles.com/trikecomp.php Henry (Jetrike) discussed in >>depth on braking & turning, and favored the tadpole for larger tilting >>range, http://jetrike.com/tadpole-or-delta.html. >> >> >> >>Cargo / weight distribution is another good deciding factor for a delta or >>tadpole. If the load is a large flat solar panel in my case, it seems that >>placing it up front would give better weight distribution for a FWD. Plus >>having the electric motor in the rear tadpole wheel may be simpler than in >>front delta wheel. >> >> >>Last, the curiosity factor of building a tadpole is huge :) with >>possibilities of sharing frame/module with a exiting bike or delta trike. >> Yep, the Guinea Pig needs one more module to go from bike to >>delta/tadpole/quad, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0cy50C1Lhjw >> >> >>Cheers, >> >> >>Vi >> >> >> >>>________________________________ >>>From: Gerald <bepb@xxxxxx> >>>To: python@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>Sent: Friday, September 2, 2011 11:27 AM >>>Subject: [python] Why a Tadpole? >>> >>> >>>Hi All, >>>It is not that I like to discourage creativity - inspired by your ideaes, I >>>have been thinking about a tadpole python design myself. >>> >>>But actually what specific advantage one like to gain from the tadpole >>>python design? Just to have something to aim for. >>> >>>Gerald >>> > >