[pythian] Re: CODE - AI
- From: Ken Pierce <ken.pierce@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pythian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 22:22:48 +0100
I like this idea, if we train AIs using learning, then fix it, we will
(hopefully) get realistic bahaviour but held in a predictable pattern.
What I would gladly volenteer to play against AIs in a training
environment so they can learn tactics etc. If we had a small arena with
lots of stimuli (places to hide, jump on etc.) then this would be
totally cool - like the Matrix training programs; sweet.
>We wouldn't implement learning in game. I imagine something more like
>where we spend a lot of time training our AIs in an arena or something
>and then we release them as fixed-knowledge AIs in the game.
>
>For instance, NNs don't always have to be learning. You can just take
>the values in the NN and leave them as-is, and then you have an AI with
>all the knowledge of the NN but can't learn.
>
>Darryl
>
>
>
>Andy wrote:
>
>
>
>>I only have one question...
>>
>>what should learning be good for, in our case ???
>>
>>
Other related posts:
