On Tuesday 01 March 2005 10:44, Justin F. Knotzke wrote: > <quote who=Sauerwald Mark date=[2/27/2005 19:59]/> > > > Where I have had the best results, is not to try > > scanning the negative, but to generate a print in the > > wet darkroom, then scan the print. > > Mark and everyone else who replied: Thank You. > > I at least now know why they come out sucky. The problem for is I > like B&W film and I like developing my own. I like making my own prints. > The fact that the scans come out looking so horribly is problematic. > > What I might do is get myself a used JOBO CPE2 and then see how I > like colour. I might have to start choosing which films I use based on > if I think I will scan it or not. Not sure.. You don't need a Jobo for colour. Simple and cheap methods exist to handle C-41 processing. If later you decide that you like processing colour you can spend the money on a processor. IIRC the CPE-2 is also the most limited model. If you decide to go that route it might make sense to spend a little more and get the bigger model. Nick ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.