[pure-silver] Re: Physical and chemical development

  • From: `Richard Knoppow <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 01:32:19 -0700

Oh, golly, more. It may also be that Eder is refering to the production of a stain image by Pyrogallol developers (and some others) along with the silver. The stain is a reaction product of development and is exactly proportional to the silver. In fact, the silver can be bleached out leaving the stain. The stain is a pigment, rather yellowish in color, and is quite permanent. Pyro also causes a proportional hardening of the gelatin resulting in a relief image which can be seen by reflected light. The relief image can be used to produce prints by differential absorption of dyes or inks. When this is desired the proportions of the developer are modified to exagerate the effect. This allows silver-gelatin emulsions to be used in some of the processes othewise depending on dichromate sensitization of gelatin or other colloids, such as gum arabic, which have only a fraction of the sensitivity to light. This was the basis of the Dye Transfer process sold by Kodak for color printing and, indeed, the Technicolor "dye imbibition" process for printing color motion pictures. However, most often physical development refers to the deposition of silver on the exposed silver grains as they are being converted to silver in a conventional developer. It is generally supposed to take place in slow, high sulfite, developers. In fact, pyro developers usually contain only modest amounts of sulfite if they are intended to produce either a stain image or a substantial amount of differential hardening since sulfite generally interferes with the production of reaction products in development. That is one of their main purposes.

On 7/15/2015 12:15 AM, Brian Smith (Redacted sender smithcbrian2@yahoo for DMARC) wrote:

Hi folks - I wonder if someone can explain this to me please?
I'm reading an old book on the history of photography (by JM Eder). He
distinguishes between physical development and chemical development, but I
don't understand his explanations (or they are contradictory). Both seem to
involve a developing agent, e.g. pyrogallol.
Can anyone elighten me please?
Regards - Brian Smith




--
Richard Knoppow
dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
WB6KBL

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: