[pure-silver] Re: Phototec times for Tri-x and Tmax 100
- From: Janet Cull <jcull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:01:55 -0400
On Aug 26, 2008, at 9:51 AM, ERoustom wrote:
There's no need to develop 120 film any longer than 135 film is there?
There is for me. I'm assuming it's a difference in metering. My 35s
have built in meters while I use a Minolta IVF for the mf. The
exposures seem to be very different so I always have to add
developing time for my 120 film. I shoot TMax (finishing off some
old film) and TriX.
My 120 negatives often look flatter than my 35mm film. I'm saying
"flatter". I'm not sure that's the right description. Just not as
good, and I know that shouldn't be so since I'm shooting a
Hasselblad. Obviously, the larger negative holds up better for
enlarging but otherwise I'm not always more pleased with those
shots. I'm still working away at it, though.
The club is small; 5 of us. I'm the only one that does my own
developing and printing so I didn't get what I was hoping for, but
it's nice to have somebody to talk photography with.
Janet
Other related posts:
