[pure-silver] Re: Kodak sells sensor business
- From: Eric Nelson <emanmb@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2011 09:47:39 -0800 (PST)
A 3006 Jobo tank will do 5 sheets so you wouldn't gain much. On top of it,
last time I checked, used 3006 drums were selling for over $600 used on ebay
which originally cost $200-ish.
Clients throw me all types of film in various formats other than what I use for
my own work, hence my issues with finding times, temps and dilutions. I do
keep a Filemaker database of mine and client times and temps but there's always
someone w/a different format or film type wanting to do PHD with a film that
hasn't got a good starting point posted anywhere.
Some of these films aren't exotic at all and I remember having a hard time
finding a good listing for TMX 35mm. Eventually used 2:2:100 for 8.5 mins @72
for anyone out there in the same boat.
I use speakers too but sometimes it makes it hard to hear the voice in my
head.... :D
________________________________
From: BOB KISS <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 10:57 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Kodak sells sensor business
DEAR
ERIC,
I
tray process up to 4 sheets of 8X10 at a time in PMK with no problems and,
unless you have a VERY big Jobo, I don’t think it will handle more than
that. Given this, I never bothered buying a Jobo and stuck with PMK. I also
use Pyrocat HD sometimes for my other subjects shot with 8X10 (and smaller
formats) and have loved the results both for scanning and printing with PT-PD.
I agree with you that Pyro HD seems to yield more printing contrast than is
apparent
to the PMK experienced eye.
I
agree that there is sizeable confusion over the dilutions but, as always, why
not narrow down your favorite film stock(s) to your very favorites and “Test,
baby, test!” different dilutions/times till you get what gives you your
best prints.
Lastly,
I have speakers in the darkroom on which I play on-line baroque music or Chopin
so I don’t want the sound of a processing machine interrupting my
enjoyment and I am in hurry to finish any faster! ;-))
CHEERS!
BOB
________________________________
From:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Eric Nelson
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011
11:42 AM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Kodak
sells sensor business
How
do you process your sheet film? Do you use PMK in trays?
I
switched a while back to pyrocat hd as it is recommended for rotary, which I
use, and am happy with it, although I never made a direct comparison
w/PMK. Haven't run any 8x10 in any pyro formula in some time but
experienced unevenness using a Jobo & PMK years ago as well as with 120
films. I would dump and refill w/new developer 1/2-way through the
process for the oxidation, presoak etc.
I
used to process w/PMK with the original recommendation of using the used
developer as an after bath after fixing, which is no longer recommended, and it
created an extreme blockage of UV for palladium et al. I've not tried a
pyrocat hd neg w/palladium.
The
one downside of pyrocat is there's no centralized, authoritative source of dev.
times online that I've found and the application of 1:1:100 vs 2:2:100
dilutions has never been clear to me. Some sites I see 2:2:100 being
applied for silver and others I saw saying that 2:2:100 was only for 'alt'.
e
________________________________
From:BOB
KISS <bobkiss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011
7:49 AM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Kodak
sells sensor business
DEAR ALL,
My book BARBADOS CHATTEL HOUSES which will be launched here
in
Barbados
on Nov 29th has more than 115 fine art b&w photos, 99% made with
8X10 Tri-x processed in PMK. When I was about to restock the 8X10 that I
used to get in 50 sheet boxes, I was told that it was only available in 10
sheet boxes driving the price way above the grant money that I had received.
So, I tried Ilford HP5 PLUS and got some lovely results in PMK. It
printed
well in platinum-palladium (the medium in which prints of the images from
the book are available) and scanned beautifully to create the file that the
printer used for the book.
As my previous incarnation as an advertising and fashion
photog I
had always been a Kodak fan due more to their quality control than the
quality of their films. They were reliable and, given the financial (and
reputation) risks involved in shoots, I just couldn't afford a problem. I
do recall the time that I foolishly tried some Ilford film (without testing
it first: Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea culpa maxima!) to shoot a VIP from
the
Metropolitan Opera. The Ilford Tech Rep had given me the film to try out
as
he was hoping to get some business. Because they had changed printers on
the medium format backing paper, there were some printing effluents left in
the 120 backing paper that desensitized the film in specific areas and
resulted in the frame numbers etc showing up on my negs as reduced density
areas making the negs unprintable. I never touched Ilford film again
until
I could afford to risk losing personal photos.
However, I have had excellent results with the 8X10 HP5
PLUS. And I
am thinking of getting those negs out of storage and seeing if I can fix
them in Frotoshop. What a surprise for that VIP...30 years later!!!
CHEERS!
BOB
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6622 (20111111) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
__________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus signature
database 6622 (20111111) __________
The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
http://www.eset.com
Other related posts:
