----- Original Message ----- From: "John" <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, May 27, 2005 4:45 PM Subject: [pure-silver] Re: AgfaPhoto Insolvency > On Fri, 27 May 2005 16:30:01 -0700, you wrote: > >>I've heard of that, but it's unobtainable in the US as far >>as I can =20 >>tell. The main reason I like Sistan over toning is I can >>use it on =20 >>film; also that it doesn't require quite the same care >>that the =20 >>toners I'm familiar with do. If I can't get access to >>Sistan I =20 >>probably won't be able to get access to Viradon either, >>but KBT is =20 >>potentially practical; however, it will only be practical >>for paper =20 >>as far as I know. I know there was a lot of microfilm >>research that =20 >>examined toning film in selenium toners, but I don't think >>they cared =20 >>as much about the change in color as I would (since if the >>emulsion =20 >>changes color it will change the effect of VC filters; >>selenium's =20 >>intensifying properties would also be undesirable in a >>negative). =20 >>Thus my concern. >> >>If there's anywhere that imports Ag Guard into the US, >>then I'd like =20 >>to hear about it as a contingency. >> >>Graham > > Anyone (besides me) consider Kodak GP-1 ? The change to > the image is = > insignificant > if even observable. > > JD - www.puresilver.org > GP-1 has been around for a long time and recommended by Kodak for protecting prints. It probably works fine on film too. Kodak has another, more elaborate toner for microfilm (GP-2). I think the only drawback to Gold toners is cost. There really is not that much Gold in GP-1, I have not calculated what it cost to make and use. --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.