[pure-silver] Re: And you thought your exposures were long

  • From: Laurence Cuffe <cuffe@xxxxxxx>
  • To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 10:02:21 +0000 (GMT)



On Jan 05, 2012, at 11:58 PM, Peter Badcock <peter.badcock@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I wonder why he doesn't fix the image to prevent it being lost in the scanning process ?

"Even so, with the length of Chrisman’s exposures, the paper is extremely overexposed. There is no need to use chemicals to bring up the image. After so long, it is there on its own and visible to the naked eye. “If I were to try to develop the paper in a traditional darkroom, the image would be lost,” said Chrisman. Instead, he uses a scanner to capture the image from the paper, and in doing so, destroys the paper image itself. “The bright light of the scanner slowly erases the image, inch by inch, as it captures it."
 
Interesting thought. Part of the fun with this is that the image has colourations, which can be quite delicate. I suspect that fixing would destroy or change these.

All the best

Laurence Cuffe

Other related posts: