[pure-silver] Re: 220 Gone Bye Bye?
- From: Graham Hughes <graham@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:00:07 -0800
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Jim Brick wrote:
> Well... 220 film is exactly 68" long (that's 5'8").
>
> I use a lot of 220 film. Kodak still makes Tri-X, Plus-X, and BW400CN in
> 220. I have found that Plus-X, APX-100, & FP4+, expose and develop
> pretty much the same for a given zone situation.
I'd be tempted to use the Tri-X in 220 if it wasn't Tri-X 320; I need
the 400 speed stuff for the environments where I'd want 220 film. Also
I was unable to confirm that they still sold Plus-X in 220 from either
Adorama or B&H.
Graham
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFtoVn2kJk3FmxWkQRAs/nAJ4rKqCMB180x5VQrB/FpaDhr5VfIACdH62g
jkBFYMdhKzpIZx5nfXN+0m4=
=S+Uj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
Other related posts:
