[pskmail] Re: Fighting pactor jammers, server changes
- From: Per Crusefalk <per@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 18:54:10 +0200
Sounds good to me.
73 de Per, sm0rwo
On ons, 2007-08-29 at 16:09 +0200, Rein Couperus wrote:
> Suggestion:
>
> Can we QSY 250 up, then we don't collide with the most active pactor mailbox.
> Moreover we are then just out of the ALE band.
> So I would prefer 10.148.250...
>
> 73,
>
> Rein PA0R
>
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Gesendet: 28.08.07 23:12:13
> > An: pskmail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Betreff: [pskmail] Fighting pactor jammers, server changes
>
>
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Had a busy evening here. Wolf/OE7FTJ is on vacation in Italy and
> > connected on 30 meters. The connect started fine, just the usual initial
> > collision, and when it was time for traffic the pactor stations started
> > jamming. They went on for a while and then the link recovered and
> > traffic was about to start...enter pactor agn.
> > This scenario was repeated until the band closed.
> >
> > In order to better support Wolf I have changed to a vertical antenna
> > (its tilted 45 degrees however) and started scanning again. It was very
> > dark out here when I ran around laying out the radials so any reception
> > reports would be interesting.
> >
> > 73 de Per, sm0rwo
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Other related posts:
