I'm up for it :)
On 5 March 2018 at 17:00, Jonathan Blake <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do have some experience with Trello. I think it would be a step up from
the current process in any case. I really want to get started with
something and get back to working on the errata. We can try out Trello for
a month or two and then reconsider. Any objections?
Jon
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 at 00:40 David Davis <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
the cells in Google Sheets are pretty nasty to be trying to type longish
sentences in, though, especially on a phone
Sent from my BlackBerry — the most secure mobile device
*From:* james.durrant@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Sent:* 5 March 2018 8:30 a.m.
*To:* projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Reply to:* projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [projectaon] Re: Defect tracking software?
I fear any defect tracking system may be overkill for what we need
How about something simple like Google Sheets?
*From:* projectaon-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:projectaon-bounce@
freelists.org] *On Behalf Of *David Davis
*Sent:* 04 March 2018 20:58
*To:* Project Aon List <projectaon@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
*Subject:* [projectaon] Re: Defect tracking software?
That's not a bad idea at all - if each errata is on it's own ticket, it's
much easier for us all to log on and make a comment, without having all
these big email quote trails.
All the firms I've work at use Atlassian Jira for this, but I that would
probably be too expensive for us.
This link might be useful https://www.codeinwp.com/blog/
free-jira-alternatives/
<https://eur01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.codeinwp.com%2Fblog%2Ffree-jira-alternatives%2F&data=02%7C01%7C%7C709f96c033214b5836d208d58212a148%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636557938872283424&sdata=fr2lKlTxelK6SeJAGq8f4D%2BmQ6GoQTWDF2vvseLdjPA%3D&reserved=0>
On 4 March 2018 at 20:54, Jonathan Blake <jonathan.blake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I don't want to get distracted from processing errata, but it seems clear
that we're going to have a lot to process. The way we've handled it so far
on the mailing list is a bit crude and doesn't scale well.
I was wondering if anyone had suggestions for a defect/feature tracking
software that we could use to track errata, that could be set up
quickly/cheaply and would facilitate good discussion. I don't have much
experience with this kind of system, so your thoughts would be very helpful.
--
Jon
