I hurried to the bottom of this message expecting to find an "April Fool" but all I got was "this page cannot be displayed" when I clicked on the link. Same thing I suspect! Joyce ----- Original Message ----- From: "The Keyboard Cowboy" <KBCowboy@xxxxxxxxx> To: "PCTechTalk - Freelists" <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:22 PM Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- New Virus Infection > Human Contact Spreads PC Viruses > By A.C. Feafunnoll > The federal Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Science > Foundation (NSF) have issued a stunning joint announcement: PC > viruses, worms, and spyware can now be transmitted via human contact. > Researchers at St. Paul's College in Virginia have isolated roughly > 100 cases of systems infected by human contact, the two agencies said > at a press conference at NSF headquarters in Arlington, Virginia. The > mode of transmission? Each system's user had physical contact with > another user whose system was known to be infected. The level of > contact was found to be as brief as a handshake. One researcher, > Avril Hidokwon, said she documented a case where the Netsky.P virus > spread to 12 systems via a sneeze. > > Scientists have long held that electronic viruses could not possibly > spread unless there was some sort of digital (wired or wireless) > connection between the infected PC and the victim systems (or the > victim systems and servers). "What we did not account for," explained > Hidokwon at the hastily organized joint press conference, "was > nanotechnology." Apparently these PC viruses, Trojan horses, and > pieces of spyware are not simply floating on air or clinging to > people's hands; they're actually being transported via "nanobots" > tiny robots that may be no more than a molecule in size and are > capable of carrying out simple instructions. There is already a cell- > sized robot that can walk on its own. But these virus bots are, > according to the CDC's Earl Leis, an accident. "We believe that the > first infections originated in California," Leis explained. According > to a statement handed out to journalists at the Arlington press > conference, two scientists in Southern California, Daniel Banner and > Petrona Parker, reported in January that about 140,000 nanobots that > had been developed to deliver insulin to diabetics via the bloodstream > had been lost in their lab. The NSF noted the incident but did not > report it to any other government body. "We assumed," said the NSF's > Charlene Crykit, "that the bots would simply run out of power and die. > That, obviously, never happened." > > The current theory holds that the bots affixed themselves to > biohazardous material that was disposed of by the lab. Then, during > California's recent rainstorms, the bots used the sewer systems to > spread and, possibly, propagate. > > The NSF and CDC, however, are at a loss to figure out how the bots > got from the sewers to computers. "One theory," said the CDC's Leis, > "is that some runoff made it to the California water-filtration > plants and eventually got into the drinking supply." As for how the > infected water made in into an infected PC, Leis theorizes that > "someone accidentally spilled drinking water on his or her keyboard." > > "I'm not at all surprised," said PC industry watcher and longtime > PCMag.com columnist John C. Dvorak. "It was bound to happen. All of > our > systems are rife with spyware, and many, many of them have hidden > viruses." Dvorak even has a theory on how the infected nanobots got > back out of the infected system and onto the first human carrier, > "Some idiot burned a CD or DVD and then took it out of the &&^%*&!-up > system. The %#&*! bots then went directly from the surface of the > optical disk to some poor schlub's hands. Most of these idiots don't > even bother to wash their hands after using the bathroom. He probably > wiped his hand right across his face and inhaled the suckers. The > rest is history. Sheesh!" For now, the CDC and NSF believe that the > outbreak is confined to Southern California, New Mexico, Utah, New > York City, and Delaware. They're asking computer users in those states > and municipalities to shut down all of their systems and servers for > 72 hours. Trapped in the systems without any light, moisture, or > electricity, the system-bots should die within 24 to 72 hours, the > agencies said. As for bodily contact, users in the afflicted areas > should bathe themselves, family members, and even pets in kosher salt > baths. That will make the bots gorge themselves on diluted salt and > die within 26 minutes, say the California researchers who developed > them. Companies in affected states should close down their offices, > contact a haz-mat team, and have them sweep for infections. > > For instructions on how you can decontaminate yourself and your PC > and also avoid infection, go here: > > _http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1781206,00.asp_ > (http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,1759,1781206,00.asp) > > > Regards from > > Bob -- the "Keyboard Cowboy", > ,,,,,,,, > Ô¿Ô¬ > Cincinnati, Ohio - Scottsdale, Arizona > ----------------------------------------------- > Friday, 4/1/2005, @ 10:17:34 PM EST > ----------------------------------------------- > A man who thinks too much about his ancestors is like a potato-the > best part of him is underground. > > > -- > <Please delete this line and everything below.> > > To unsub or change your email settings: > //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk > > To access our Archives: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ > //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ > > For more info: > //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk > > -- <Please delete this line and everything below.> To unsub or change your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ For more info: //www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/list?list_id=pctechtalk