[patriots] Re: "Military Death Beam"
- From: Paul Talbot-Jenkins <fame_97@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx" <johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 23:12:13 +0100
Hi John,
Did you ever see the ground radio transmission set up near Daventry, or the one
near Bedford? These were for transmitting radio waves in the days before
satellites, the principle reflected radio waves between the ionosphere and the
ground to achieve long range transmission such as the BBC World Service to
overseas colonies. Because the layers of the atmosphere behave like the waves
of the sea, reception of the radio signal usually drifted in and out. These set
ups look exactly like the HAARP installation. I am sceptical about the
conspiracy theory about HAARP.
With best wishes
Paul
www.force4justice.co.uk
Sent from my iPad
> On 20 May 2014, at 09:28, "john TIMBRELL" <johntimbrell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On speed reading the attached report it appears to me that HAARP program is
> only one small part of the weather modification program which include many
> and various other technologies.
> Obviously the attached report was written some time ago so what the up to
> date program is I haven't a clue JohnT
> Does this mean that chem-trailing will cease, and that they will no longer
> try to ‘own the weather by 2025’ as in the attached report?
> It's Not a "Military Death Beam" and It's Not Getting Any More Federal Funding
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/us-ionospheric-research-facility-to-close/
> Unless a new patron emerges, the U.S. Government's High Frequency Active
> Auroral Research Program is threatened with closure next month
> May 16, 2014 |By Sharon Weinberger and Nature magazine
> The world’s most advanced ionospheric research facility has in its lifetime
> faced allegations of being a 'military death beam', a weapon of weather
> control and even a top-secret mind-control project. Now, the US government’s
> High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is threatened with
> closure.
>
> HAARP, near Gakona, Alaska, comprises radio transmitters and antennas that
> are used to heat up the ionosphere — the uppermost region of the atmosphere —
> creating a laboratory in the sky for scientists.The facility has been used to
> produce an artificial aurora and to study how charged particles behave in the
> ionosphere, at a total cost of more than $250 million to build and operate.
>
> Its bizarre backstory rivals that of a blockbuster Hollywood film. A powerful
> US senator from Alaska, Republican Ted Stevens, helped win approval for the
> facility in the early 1990s. But to justify HAARP’s price, the Pentagon had
> to dream up exotic military applications, sparking conspiracy theories.
>
> In 2008, Stevens was voted out of office barely a week after being convicted
> of corruption (the conviction was tossed out in 2009 amid allegations of
> prosecutorial misconduct, and Stevens died in a plane crash the following
> year). He was replaced by Democrat Mark Begich, whose brother has been an
> outspoken advocate for the idea that HAARP is a secret military weapons
> project.
>
> Difficult balance
> The practical challenge for HAARP has been to balance its role as a
> Pentagon-operated site for developing military applications with its function
> as a basic science facility. Supporters have long tried to come up with
> potential military uses, such as testing deep-sea communications for
> submarines, detecting underground military bunkers and cleaning up
> satellite-disabling electrons in the event of a high-altitude nuclear
> detonation.
>
> Research into that last application had been supported by the US Defense
> Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), but its chief says that the agency
> is now abandoning its work at HAARP. “[There is] not an ongoing need for
> DARPA, despite the fact that we had gotten good value out of that
> infrastructure in the past,” DARPA director Arati Prabhakar told a US Senate
> committee on May 14.
>
> The final DARPA-sponsored experiment, called Basic Research on Ionospheric
> Characteristics and Effects (BRIOCHE), is scheduled to end in mid-June. With
> DARPA’s work coming to an end, the US Air Force, which manages HAARP, says
> that there are no more paying customers for facility, and thus no reason to
> keep it open.
>
> The facility will be shut down as soon as the DARPA experiment ends, says Air
> Force spokesman Ed Gulick. “The plan allows the Air Force to remove critical
> equipment prior to the onset of winter,” he says.
>
> Some in the Pentagon seem to be interested in saving the facility, but say
> there is no money. “I’m torn on this,” said Alan Shaffer, the acting US
> assistant secretary of defence for research and engineering, at the 14 May
> hearing. “I think [HAARP] is a world-class facility.”
>
> No obvious champions have emerged in Congress, and the US National Science
> Foundation has told HAARP supporters that it does not have funds to support
> the programme, says Dennis Papadopoulos, a physicist at the University of
> Maryland in College Park. The University of Alaska has offered to maintain
> HAARP but would still need government funding, at least for an interim period.
>
> Yet Papadopoulos argues that HAARP could, similarly to other
> ionosphere-research facilities, be self-supporting within three or four
> years, living off payments from researchers. In the meantime, the facility
> would need about $2.5 million annually to stay open. Dismantling a facility
> that has cost more than $250 million to build and operate doesn’t make sense,
> he adds.
>
> Scientists are left with few other options. The US National Astronomy and
> Ionosphere Center in Arecibo, Puerto Rico, which is also used for ionosphere
> research, has been undergoing repairs for several years, and is not as
> powerful as HAARP even when it is fully functional. That leaves just the
> European Incoherent Scatter Scientific Association facilities in northern
> Scandinavia.
>
> “To me, the way it looks, this is the end of radio science research in the
> United States,” Papadopoulos says.
>
> This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The
> article was first published on May 16, 2014.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your message is ready to be sent with the following file or link attachments:
> vol3ch15 Owning the Weather.pdf
>
> Note: To protect against computer viruses, email programs may prevent you
> from sending or receiving certain types of file attachments. Check your email
> security settings to determine how attachments are handled.
>
>
Other related posts:
