From: Rays1 [mailto:rayspost@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 06 February 2015 01:55 To: 'Jack Lewis' Subject: RE: [patriots] FW: Latest from Hacking the Constitution UK facilitators Jack, I prefer not to label anyone, be that labelling them “Jew” - as you now often do to people - or any other name come to that since it leads down only one path –which is the pointless round-about of me then calling you names in return. Maybe that’s what you want? If so, Just let me know But Jack , increasingly now you just say boring things like, “Are you a Jew”? (and then you simply add your target de-Jure’ name eg: Tom, Dick or Harry) Of course, I will neither answer nor address that – because it’s a silly and vacuous question undeserving of your intellect if you could but see that –but maybe you are just unable to see it at the moment? Rather than answer that not very important point Jack, Possibly you converted from the Jewish or more likely the Islamic faith to the Christian at some point because there be none so vocal as the converted preaching to the “Blind” and the “unbeliever” – a bit like the reformed smoker who lambasts those who are so foolish as to “refuse to see the light” – excuse the pun. Muslims behave exactly the same as that but then again, the “Jooos” say the same kind of thing about “unbelievers” and “Kuffars” etc so, just what all you religious types actually think has long been a mystery to me - and is of even less interest. But, were you once a Jew (or maybe a Muslim) at an earlier time in life, Jack? Which church do you go to on a Sunday, if you go at all? Whatever the case, you should IMHO stop this nonsensical distraction of endless targeting of “DA JOOOOS” and starting arguments amongst our own and instead, try to direct your energies and efforts more into helping those of us who truly care for our country to do what we can to avert this constitutional crisis and slow-motion Coup-D’etat that is taking place as we speak. After all, how do your repeated “Da Jooos” lambasts serve us right at this minute?.....Will it get decent MP’s elected?..will it convince any moral and decent Police Constable to help us? - NO, it will not!. The fact that you refuse to address the constitutional questions I raised, and instead choose to respond with such a crass question as..... ........”Are you a Jew, Ray?” .....speaks only to your somewhat juvenile militancy – and I wonder why that should be? Are you a converted Jew or Muslim then, Jack? Ray From: Jack Lewis [mailto:ukpatriot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 05 February 2015 22:31 To: rayspost@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [patriots] FW: Latest from Hacking the Constitution UK facilitators Hi Ray, I asked you in my last email to you if you were a Jew. Jack On 05/02/2015 22:09, Rays1 wrote: From: Rays1 [mailto:rayspost@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 05 February 2015 21:53 To: ecg (ecg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) Subject: FW: Latest from Hacking the Constitution UK facilitators From: Rays1 [mailto:rayspost@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 05 February 2015 21:51 To: rays1 Subject: RE: Latest from Hacking the Constitution UK facilitators The LSE is also talking about this “Transforming”. This link mentions some of the LSE facebook and twitter accounts’ on this subject too which some may like to view and add their tuppence worth....... http://www.lse.ac.uk/publicEvents/events/2015/01/20150121t1830v32LG03.aspx I understand it to be fairly common knowledge, internationally, that constitutions may apply to various institutions and not just Nations but, what I don’t understand is how it is that institutions such as say, my local British Legion or even the local bowling club for that matter, may NOT alter their constitution under ANY circumstances “except by resolution carried by a majority of at least two thirds of the members present at a General Meeting...” as there would be complete uproar - of course - should any small clique dare to try and do so WITHOUT the majority membership being given their votes..... Yet these few self-anointed people such as the LSE, Cameron et-al clearly consider themselves to be so righteous and superior as to have the ‘right’ to not just change our constitution but to “Transform” it - not only that but to simultaneously have the audacity to propose denying the entire nation It’s God-given right to mandatory majority constitutional vote under international law at the same time? Would it not be correct to say that what we are witnessing is a slow-motion Coup-D’état? What else could it be?, and more to the point, why are we all allowing them to do it so Brazenly? Surely they have come full circle and this cabal now considers itself to have almost a “Divine Right” to rule like a latter day Louis XIV or something?...and it can only get worse. Check the face below....I ask you, is that not a common facial expression amongst many Ministers today?. The costume would’nt look at all out of place either come to that. Ray Louis XIV (1701) Louis XIV of France.jpg From: ECG [mailto:ecg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 05 February 2015 10:27 To: ECG Subject: Fwd: Latest from Hacking the Constitution UK facilitators Dear all, Please see below Jane's superb response to one of the facilitators on the ConstitutionUK Forum which is being administered by the LSE's Institute of Public Affairs. Jane is doing an excellent job of drawing attention to the treason being committed by our government in attempting to rewrite the constitution of our nation. We all owe Jane a great deal of thanks for the work she is doing and for raising the profile of the ECG. Jane's username on the ConstitutionUK Forum is Boadicea. You can see her profile and follow her contributions here <https://constitutionuk.com/user/activity/47853> . I suggest that as many of us as possible join the Forum and lend Jane our support. cid:image002.jpg@01D041A5.09F3DB50 -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: Latest from Hacking the Constitution UK facilitators Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2015 01:36:59 -0000 From: Bob & Jane To: This subversive group don’t like the truth. Yet another facilitator trying to stop me speaking the truth. Image removed by sender. laureroux laure roux london, United Kingdom Joined on Jan 12, 2015 Age 18-29 Gender Female Highest level of Education Postgraduate degree Should the UK have a written codified constitution? Yes Skills and expertise linguist Common Law European Law civil law Dear Boadicea, I am a facilitator for the "International Relations" challenge. The reason why I am writing to you today is because I feel that you are negative about this project. This negativity tends to freeze the debate and the different ideas that have been submitted. Indeed some of your comments, when you mention treason for instance or when you formulate this idea " catching traitors", are not in line with the goal of this project, that is, crowdsourcing ideas that could be transformed in a constitutional provision. I agree that your comments are spotting concerning issues and I can see that you have expertise on plenty of topics what is great. I encourage you to keep posting comments and ideas but do you think you could adopt a more constructive approach? I hope you understand my concern, Yours faithfully, Laure Roux. My reply: Dear Laureroux, I understand your concern that this unlawful project may be scuppered by my input, and I am greatly saddened that you would attempt to stifle valid points raised, which incidentally represent the truth. We already have Constitutional Provision - as you put it. I represent the English Constitution Group which is avowed to protect the ancient rights and liberties handed down to the people of this nation, and which were achieved through many struggles. Learned people from the Estates of England carefully crafted our Foundation documents of Magna Carta and the Bill of Rights 1688/9, and they were agreements between the Estates of England and the Monarch/Office of the Crown, to guard against the tyranny of ambitious power hungry politicians and monarchs and subversive elements. Please note these agreements did not include parliament, and parliament have no jurisdiction over them. Not only that they are for all time to come, and any attempt to subvert, change or do away with them, is to imagine the death of the monarch, and threaten the rights of the people, which constitutes the major crime of treason. You may well have studied current doctored law, but you are not cognisant with the correct unadulterated law of this realm. The Treason Acts will be the very first to be left out of any new constitution as for some 50 years, they have been such a thorn in the side of the succession of governments whose senior politicians are painfully aware that their activities have left them wide open to major prosecution under these laws. Their continuous programme of destroying Britishness and surrendering the British nation to a foreign power (the EEC/ EU) for others’ political purpose, marks each one as a very serious traitor to their own people. Since, in those governments’ view there can be no such thing as treason, there can be no need for such antiquated and unnecessary legislation in a democracy where only the presiding government has any say and the sole purpose of the people is to serve the State, when it should be the State to serve the people”. In short an elected dictatorship and tyranny. You are all fairly young and idealistic, and truly believe you are trying to do a good thing, but a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, and many of the contributors do not have the necessary gravitas to make decisions on such an important matter which will impact on every man, woman and child in the country. -- www.classicarartist.co.uk