That's a big job; expensive and time consuming. But when you think about it, how cool it would be to play a part of such a restoration? > On Feb 17, 2015, at 11:04 AM, Howard Moneta <hmoneta@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think some folks would be interested in this status report. > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Brian Skiff <bas@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:bas@xxxxxxxxxx>> > Date: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 > Subject: [AZ-Observing] Lowell Clark refurbishment and re-installation > To: az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:az-observing@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Folks have asked me about progess on the refurbishment > of the Lowell Clark refractor. Thanks to the dry > winter, and the fact that the telescope mechanical > parts presented fewer problems than might have > been found, things are progressing very well. > Briefly, every metal part from very big to > very small, has been gone over or re-made. > To give you an idea of the scale, the RA and Dec > axles are 1100 pounds each, and the housing on > each are another 1100 pounds. Those counterweights > at the end of the Dec axle are 400 pounds each > (six of 'em). > Many of the parts at the business end of the > telescope have been made new to look like copies > of the originals, but better. (This mainly done by > Peter Rosenthal.) Big engineering parts have been > refinished and reassembled with current-technology > and modern lubrication (for instance) so that things > will not oxidize etc. There are now CAD drawings of > everything, so that when we do this again a hundred > years from now, there'll be something to work from. > (The Clarks supplied no drawings or instruction manual!) > The dome has also been completely gone over to make > it structurally sound, back into code as far as > electrical etc, decent lighting installed (at last!), > and much else. The whole thing is going to look > _beautiful_ when it's put back together. > Ralph Nye, who is in charge of all this, > has scheduled a crane for March 16 to start moving > the mount back into the dome, and by March 19 > the idea is to reassemble the telescope. > They're talking sometime in May to have the telescope > back on-line and fully functional. > > > \Brian > > > -- > See message header for info on list archives or unsubscribing, and please > send personal replies to the author, not the list. > >