For the religious among us, it occurs to me that we should all thank God that
our listserve was never merged with one for Abbot.
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 09:51:30 PM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I just found her pictures, a truly upsetting experience. I should have waited
until tomorrow. She did not age well. She looks like she might come in second
just behind Hillary as an unpleasant experience, not as evil though. Hoping
this does not cause any nightmares
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 09:39:02 PM EST, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
OK, let's make it a three-way. Add in Andrea Dworkin. You may have took up
her picture. Think "this cannot be a real person".
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 09:36:10 PM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hillary is the better looking of the two, but her pure projection of evil
makes the choice clear
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 09:28:05 PM EST, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Morgan cited her height and thought it would be like climbing a mountain. Ad
lib jokes are not always winners. Let's face it, if there was an additional
choice, drowning in a vat of monkey puke or sliding down a mile long razor
blade, it would still be a tough one.
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 09:00:05 PM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
How much foreplay was involved and how quickly you could get away would be
major considerations. And in Hillary's case, whether there were any sharp
objects around. I might pick Janet if it was doggy style
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 03:11:43 PM EST, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In the meantime, a little humor is in order. I was listening to a replay of
an old Howard Stern interview with Tracy Morgan on SiriusXM today and Howard
was playing the game "Who would you rather fuck?" with Tracy. It was an
either/or choice between two. My favorite was a choice between Janet Reno and
Hillary Clinton. After an understandable pause, Morgan chose Reno, which tells
us a lot about why Hillary lost in 2016.
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 12:22:06 PM EST, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We're definitely fucked. Those of you who have not read Farnham's Freehold by
Heinlein can get a hint of our future from it. I'm thinking of using that to
name my future rural home.
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 11:52:05 AM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is probably how people felt during the Decline and Fall. Most people
well aware that there are problems but only vaguely aware of what they are and
why. The elites, Deep State Dems and Rinos, seem to be cheering this on. I
cannot understand why or where they think we are going.
Europe provides a clear example of the issues with unlimited immigration, but
we are turning a blind eye. Most countries there are gone as we knew them for
hundreds of years. And people there are finally waking up but it’s too late.
This is the Fourth Turning, pretty much as foretold
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
On Sunday, December 17, 2023, 10:30 AM, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The longer I live, the more obvious it is to me that big is bad. When it comes
to government, the bigger the badder. World government is already here to some
extent, with the World Health Organization having inordinate power already in
such areas as international travel and vaccine mandates, and wants, like the
CDC, to control guns as a health issue. The forces of evil are far too powerful
for the average sane person to do anything about, and the reality is that those
with the most severe personality disorders combined with the most charm rise to
the top, as evidenced by Clinton, Obama, Biden and the entire Democrat caucuses
in the House and the Senate. We have seen steady erosion in individual rights,
as expressed in the Constitution (which does not create a right of privacy
except to the limited extent expressly set out in the Fourth Amendment), and
were it not for the odiousness of Hillary Clinton, allowing Trump to steal four
years from the Left, we would not have a Supreme Court that has been a finger
in the dike on the way to tyranny. The Constitution was brilliant in many
respects, not the least of which was federalism and limited federal power. The
forces of evil desperately want to eliminate the vestiges of federalism, and
over the years have been exceptionally successful in that regard. The war on
the Left against the Electoral College is in a very real sense the last
battlefield before we become slaves to the mobs in the urban areas.
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 10:08:57 AM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Take a look at The Great Taking on You tube--not about bail-ins as in Eu, but
about seizing any assets encumbered with debt and issuing CBDC the latter
process already moving along. Who knows, but as one of my Twitter feed said
recently, which of the former "conspiracy theories" do you now feel is not
true. When they start opening up Davos to the press, and when govts in English
speaking countries around the world stop acting in unison, I will be less
skeptical about a new world order plan
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 09:37:13 AM EST, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I read frequently in scare ads in financial newsletters about how the feds
can institute a bail-in, most of which are ads for gold, but I am unaware of
the legal basis under which it could be done, particularly given that Biden has
not yet, at least formally, repealed the Fifth Amendment prohibition on
takings. What am I missing? I get that the feds have no legal obligation to pay
out uninsured amounts and they could go up in smoke, or I suppose be replaced
with scrip of some sort, but are FDIC-insured amounts actually at risk? That
would shock me. I recall back in the "S&L crisis" days there were delays in
pay-outs of FSLIC-insured deposits, but they were ultimately paid out.
On Sunday, December 17, 2023 at 09:21:25 AM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There is the possibility of “bail ins” where your deposits become equity.
Agree probably ok now insured level but this is a mess of gargantuan
proportions. Think Thirties modified by govt spraying money with a fire hose
while lying about inflation. This is a wild time!
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
On Saturday, December 16, 2023, 10:44 PM, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I would be surprised if a single bank in the country is solvent on a
liquidation basis. Probably an impossibility today. Capital requirements are a
joke when mark to market doesn't apply to vast holdings. It took me a while to
figure out you were talking about commercial real estate. I find it
inconceivable that the FDIC insured amounts would not be protected, however,
even in the shit regionals. If that happened, all bets are off.
On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 08:56:07 PM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
For a real holiday treat find The Great Taking on YouTube. Adds a very nasty
backdrop on the govt digital currency project. If they’re right, don’t worry
about high taxes, we won’t have much left.
One practical step is keep minimal to nothing in regional banks which are
likely to fall left and right in 24 unless the govt bails them out. CRE is in
worse shape than I have ever seen and that includes some awful periods and
regional banks are chock full of it
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
On Saturday, December 16, 2023, 4:52 PM, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Chinese have targeted every aspect of American life, including every
infrastructure. As an open society, we are extremely vulnerable to determined
enemies. I am giving serious thought to buying a house on some rural land in a
no-income tax state that has its own water supply and wood supply. The trick
will be timing, just like succeeding in the stock market. If I can't get there
on a full tank of gas when I need to, I'll be fucked.
On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 04:34:07 PM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If the Chinese come after us, it may well be cyber vs boots on the ground. We
are woefully unprepared with a centralized and highly vulnerable power grid. A
week without cellphones and we will be begging to surrender. It will usher in
the new WEF "you will own nothing" age with minimal carbon use. Progressives
won't be as happy as they anticipate.
On an ethnic note, despite a great Chinese influx in Boston over the past 10
years, very noticeable in Brookline, the real influx is Mexican/South American.
One restaurant after another, tacos and burritos all over the place. Chinese
influx is upper end in well paid jobs, not restaurant workers
On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 02:29:49 PM EST, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Nothing will keep us from importing another three million Jew haters from the
muslim word as long as Dems are in power. And we have no clue of how many
enemies of America are among the ten or twelve million southern border invaders
during the Biden regime. There are periodic reports of unaccompanied Chinese
males of military age coming in, and it wouldn't surprise me if there is at
least a division of them here (if they had a sense of humor they could call
themselves the Big Red One). The illegals are from all over the world, and it
would be shocking if there not a lot of actual terrorists among them forming
sleeper cells ready to terrorize. Mind-boggling is too weak a phrase to
describe the average American's response to this invasion. It is beyond belief.
And Mayorcas and Biden and his ridiculous intersectional press secretary keep
lying so blatantly about the open border.
On Saturday, December 16, 2023 at 02:23:12 PM EST, jmcculcuba @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Another reason to tighten the borders before Progressives establish a refugee
flow
Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS
On Saturday, December 16, 2023, 1:30 PM, rhelkins @ aol . com
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://freebeacon.com/latest-news/poll-shows-palestinians-widely-support-hamass-oct-7-attack/
