Well done and thank you Paul.
The Natural beekeeping could also have sub-titles, such as "Natural
beekeeping top bar hive", "Natural beekeeping rose hive" etc hive type,
"Natural beekeeping queen excluders or not", "Natural beekeeping removing
the "unwanted" queen cells or let the swarm go", "Natural beekeeping prons
and cons of feeding the bees with sugar", "Natural beekeeping treatments
and if so which ones?" ...
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
Virus-free.
www.avast.com
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail>
<#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
On Sun, 6 Jan 2019 at 13:28, Paul Honigmann <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
The BBKA redesigned its website <https://bbka.org.uk> last year. They
used to have a members' forum, predictably heavily biased towards treating
and honey, but this was wiped by the website update. A new forum has
restarted. I noticed it didn't mention natural beekeeping, so I started a
thread on the subject so newbees at least had it on their radar:
www.bbkaforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=290
Predictably, there were a couple of "robustly sceptical" responses, but
encouragingly there were also several open-minded ones from obviously
experienced conventional beekeepers, confirming several things I said; so
hopefully newbees won't be completely convinced when forceful personalities
try to undermine natural beekeeping.
I think the most convincing undermining of the cynics' arguments was their
own rabid biases and invalid logic, which were pretty obvious 8)
