Re: system statistics in 10g
- From: "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 23:58:30 +0100
You mean dbms_schedule is clearly the better
choice because DBCA is using dbms_job ?
I hadn't considered the double-bluff as a
design strategy, but I see what you mean.
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated May 1st
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark W. Farnham" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, June 18, 2004 11:35 PM
Subject: RE: system statistics in 10g
Now, now, JL, you've confused me. Is the use of one or the other by DBCA
indication of the choice reflecting "better" or "worse?"
Anyway, I thought that the choice of tools in Oracle products reflected one
product area manager owing another product area manager a favor and tortuous
computations regarding the internal compensation model.
;)
mwf
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
