RE: ouch

  • From: "Dunbar, Norman (Capgemini)" <norman.dunbar.capgemini@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Oracle L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2011 10:21:06 +0100

I've seen this sort of thing before, quite a few times. PL/SQL functions
etc to replace perfectly good built in ones. I asked the vendors to
justify their use of PL/SQL code to replace built in functions, the
replies were all the same "we write our application so that it is
database agnostic, so these functions are not Oracle specific whereas
the built in ones would be."

I invariably reply "But you are using PL/SQL to write them and PL/SQL is
Oracle Specific!" - but that's the kind of b**tard I can be at times!


Norman Dunbar
Contract Senior Oracle DBA
Capgemini Database Team (EA)
Internal : 7 28 2051
External : 0113 231 2051 

Information in this message may be confidential and may be legally privileged. 
If you have received this message by mistake, please notify the sender 
immediately, delete it and do not copy it to anyone else.

We have checked this email and its attachments for viruses. But you should 
still check any attachment before opening it.
We may have to make this message and any reply to it public if asked to under 
the Freedom of Information Act, Data Protection Act or for litigation.  Email 
messages and attachments sent to or from any Environment Agency address may 
also be accessed by someone other than the sender or recipient, for business 

If we have sent you information and you wish to use it please read our terms 
and conditions which you can get by calling us on 08708 506 506.  Find out more 
about the Environment Agency at

  • Follow-Ups:

Other related posts: