RE: oracle-l Digest V11 #134
- From: "Causey, Bob" <BCausey@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 12:48:11 -0400
Dear Sirs,
I am retiring in one month. Please remove me from your email list. Thank you
for all the support over the years. I think you have a great setup!
Bob
Bob Causey
Database Administrator
Phone: 404-264-5919
Fax: 404-238-8369
-----Original Message-----
From: FreeLists Mailing List Manager [mailto:ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2014 1:05 AM
To: oracle-l digest users
Subject: oracle-l Digest V11 #134
oracle-l Digest Sat, 10 May 2014 Volume: 11 Issue: 134
In This Issue:
Re: DB performance after upgrade from 9i to 11gR2
RE: DB performance after upgrade from 9i to 11gR2
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 19:52:03 -0400
Subject: Re: DB performance after upgrade from 9i to 11gR2
From: Wayne Smith <wts@xxxxxxxxx>
The bug Juan describes is 9842771.
As MOS describes it as fixed in 11.2.0.3 and the reporter's system has
compatibility set to 11.2.0 4, I doubt this is the problem.
Cheers, Wayne
On May 9, 2014 7:01 PM, "Juan Carlos Reyes Pacheco" <jcdrpllist@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Which version of 11g?, there is a bug on performance. it's not
> difficult to identify check your SYS.AUX_STATS$ and see if they are
> not multiplied by 10000, in metalink you can find more information.
> If you run this you can fix it.
>
> BEGIN
> FOR A IN ( SELECT PNAME,PVAL1
> FROM SYS.AUX_STATS$
> WHERE SNAME = 'SYSSTATS_MAIN'
> AND PNAME IN ('SREADTIM','MREADTIM') ) LOOP
> IF (A.PVAL1 > 75) THEN
> DBMS_STATS.SET_SYSTEM_STATS(A.PNAME, a.PVAL1 / 10000);
> DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('MREADTIM ALTERED TO: ' || a.PVAL1 / 10000);
> END IF;
> END LOOP;
> COMMIT;
> END;
> /
>
>
>
> 2014-05-08 2:39 GMT-04:00 Bheemsen Aitha <baitha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Hello DBA gurus,
>>
>>
>>
>> We recently upgraded our database from 9i to 11gR2 on Solaris 11
>> 64-bit, Veritas File system (single instance). We tested thoroughly
>> in our QA environment before the upgrade. But after the upgrade we
>> are seeing terrible performance in production with many of the
>> queries. Even though the query plan looks good with very low cost,
>> the queries are just sitting there and not finishing. Some of the
>> queries have differences in plan (FTS to index scans on small tables)
>> when compared to QA environment. We gathered stats with default auto
>> sample size and default method_opt options. I opened a ticket with
>> oracle on the performance issue, but I doubt if I can get a solution
>> on this. The QA and prod environments are exactly same, but the
>> queries are running are faster in QA. Did anyone come across similar
>> problem in the past? Any inputs are greatly appreciated.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> *BA*
>>
>>
>>
>
>
------------------------------
From: Bheemsen Aitha <baitha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: DB performance after upgrade from 9i to 11gR2
Date: Sat, 10 May 2014 23:58:57 +0000
"ØbžJ.®ö¥¹ë,yé¡·œ¢ºÞrßÒ@¿ìzWœ¶™Ú™ï齩u~º&³+
jì
²Ö³ü!z·¬?©ž
------------------------------
End of oracle-l Digest V11 #134
*******************************
��i��0���zX���+�� n��{�+i�^
Other related posts:
