RE: listener overloaded?
- From: "John Hurley" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "hurleyjohnb@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: Jeff C <backseatdba@xxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, jcwilton93@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:16:33 -0700
Good suggestion there ... while there are no "silver bullets" most modern
generic hardware can handle 10 connections a second easily. Better to have
just a couple a second ... but ...
Testing will probably show most systems can handle 100 connections a second but
start to see implications ... hundreds ain't very good ... somewhere in that 10
to 100 ish range a second most people start thinking about connection pooling
somewhere in the infrastructure.
Your mileage may vary ...
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 7/2/14, Jeremiah Wilton <jcwilton93@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Subject: RE: listener overloaded?
To: "Jeff C" <backseatdba@xxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, July 2, 2014, 8:01 PM
Tail
the listener log, and from another window do a 'lsnrctl
status'. Then see how long it takes to show up in the
listener log.
Jeremiah
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
