On 10/17/05, Wolfson Larry - lwolfs <lawrence.wolfson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Paula, > > I heard after upgrading to 9.2.06 session_cached_cursors > replaced open_cursors. > > Anybody else hear that? > > > Larry Wolfson Larry, Refer to README for 3501955, regarding "PL/SQL Cursor Caching". This was the 9.2.0.5.0 patchset. Paul > ________________________________ > > > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > On Behalf Of Paula_Stankus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 3:04 PM > To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: increasing open_cursors from 300 to 3000 > > > > > We are running with about 500 concurrent users. > > O racle Version 9.2.0.6 > > Solaris 2.9 > > 0RA-1000 "Too many open cursors" error when selecting from a sequence over a > dblink. > > Metalink Note:238407.1 describes the error and indicates that the bug id is > corrected in 9.2.0.3 and later. We're running 9.2.0.6. > > A nyone have any advice or head's up when increasing open_cursors > significantly. I would think that if these open cursors are used then there > might be memory issues. > > > > > > ************************************************************************** > The information contained in this communication is confidential, is > intended only for the use of the recipient named above, and may be legally > privileged. > > If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are > hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this > communication is strictly prohibited. > > If you have received this communication in error, please resend this > communication to the sender and delete the original message or any copy > of it from your computer system. > > Thank You. > ************************************************************************** > > -- #/etc/init.d/init.cssd stop # f=ma, divide by 1, convert to moles. -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l