RE: compilers and oracle 11g
- From: "Powell, Mark" <mark.powell2@xxxxxx>
- To: "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:38:35 +0000
And the arguable flaws in Peoplesoft are not related to the choice of language.
COBOL has lasted so long because if is a very simple language that is designed
for record processing and is very good at it.
IMHO -- Mark D Powell --
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Nuno Souto
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2010 7:30 AM
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: compilers and oracle 11g
Goulet, Richard wrote,on my timestamp of 20/03/2010 12:31 AM:
> I do believe that if you installed the 64 bit database binaries
> then the 64 bit compatible pre compiler was installed as well.
> Regrettably
Yes, that is the case.
>
> BTW: who uses Cobol any more??? Another shadow from the dark side.
Pssst: (<lowvoice> Peoplesoft -an Oracle product- is mostly written in Cobol)
--
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxx
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
