RE: anyone else get told they have to wait 4 months for a bug fix?
- From: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 10:43:26 -0500
For some strange reason, I thought that 9.2.0.4 was terminal for 9iR2. =
Or was it just "9.2.0"?
And yes, I can believe it. We had to wait for 8.1.7.4 to fix a major =
CS=3DF bug in 8.1.7.2. But as others have said, it's probably better =
this way. Look at it as an opportunity to have to test new versions so =
much as to be cost-prohibitive to upgrade.
Rich
Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator
rich.jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx QuadTech, Sussex, WI USA
> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2004 9:56 AM
> Subject: anyone else get told they have to wait 4 months for=20
> a bug fix?
>=20
>=20
> This is in production... and we transport large tablespaces=20
> daily. Can you believe this? We will have serious=20
> interruptions in service.=20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
