>>>With regards to the performance, I see where you're heading >>>(aka why not use a commodity cluster filesystem-driven >>>solution where you can scale in individual "data mover" >>>elements). ...well, it wasn't such a shameless plug for scalable NAS. I'm a bit surprised that the best the clustered NAS guys can come up with is CNS (clustered name space) solutions which is not scalable NAS at all. Hmmm... >>>backend). What I like about Netapp is the universal-ness of >>>the product (for lack of a better/real word). So - not just >>>NFS, but CIFS, Fibre Channel, iSCSI all in the same >>>platform. I can upgrade the product by ugprading the head >>>or controllers. The FlexVol architecture is a dream in >>>terms of managing complex environments, and the read-write >>>snapshots in FlexClone can be used for a whole slew of >>>different pieces of functionality. ...very compelling, thought-filled and non-religious. Nice! Please don't go talking to our Oil and Gas customers... :-) -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l