Re: Using CRS in Active - Passive Configuration
- From: "LS Cheng" <exriscer@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: jhthomp@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:11:53 +0200
I have used Oracle Clusterware 10.2 for active passive database on Sun
Solaris, 2 nodes though
--
LSC
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 4:59 PM, John Thompson <jhthomp@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm currently testing a 3 node RH Linux active/passive cluster. We have 4
> db's running on 1 node, 4 db's running on the 2nd node and using the 3rd as
> the passive node. Using ASM for storage. This is working really nice
> especially for managebility purposes as it takes only 1 command and just a
> matter of minutes to move a db from 1 node to another. I was wondering if
> anyone else is doing this sort of thing and if so, have you had any
> problems?
>
> 3 Dell 2950's w/32gb memory each running Redhat Linux 4 U 6. Using
> 11.1.0.6 for CRS and ASM. Different flavors of 10.2 for the databases
>
Other related posts:
