RE: Timestamp - to be or not to be?
- From: "Rognes, Sten" <Sten.Rognes@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 13:19:50 -0800
If you are on 9.2 and your application is using Oracle's thin jdbc drivers
to connect to the database, you might want to take a trip to Metalink and
check out bug# 3037615. There is a test case provided in the bug description
as well as possible workarounds.
Sten
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Mark Moynahan
Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 12:37 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Timestamp - to be or not to be?
Hi,
Are there any technical reasons not to go forth with timestamp instead of
date datatype? Are there any gotcha's by converting to timestamp?
If an application doesn't use fractions of a second is there any real need
to use timestamp datatype?
Thanks,
Mark
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
