You can't make a decision on how to architect a system based solely on the components at hand. There are many things to consider: is the db to be read mostly, read only, oltp? low, medium or high transaction rates? ( you define based on HW capability ) number of users? Criticality of performance? For instance, RAID 5 may be entirely suitable for an application that has low performance requirements, and you need more space than you can get from a RAID10. enough for now. Jared "Naveen, Nahata (IE10)" <Naveen.Nahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 06/08/2004 04:50 AM Please respond to oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To "Oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ORACLE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject StorEdge 3310: RAID and configuration question Hi All, I have a Sun v440 4 cpu 8GB ram with Sun StorEdge 3310 with 5x70 GB HDDs. Let me give you three scenarios: 1. On the StorEdge 3310 Array configure RAID 1+0 Using 4 disks and use one as a local hot spare 2. Configure RAID 5 on the 3310 Array 3. Put 2 disks on the other scsi channel and configure 2 RAID-1s and use the fifth disk as global spare. My question is, which one of the 3 choices is better and whether the third one is feasible? Moreover, if anyone has any other idea, please let me know. In addition to the above I have another question: In addition to the above I would like to know the pros/cons of Software mirroring? Regards, Naveen Nahata