Re: Standby Log corruption -- in Recover phase

  • From: Subodh Deshpande <deshpande.subodh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: krishna.setwin@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:06:14 +0530

may be the insufficient fbr area is the cause..think on whether you can
separate fbr and archive log destination.
if there are any missing archives in between it will not apply the latest
shipped..check the archive gap between primary and standby


On 2 July 2012 16:27, Krishna <krishna.setwin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi All,
> I am trying to set up RAC to RAC dataguard between 2 databases in different
> data centers.
> I am able to ship archivelogs from primary to DR. The logs are not getting
> applied.
>
>
> In the standby alert log -- I see the following errors (several of these
> CORRUPTION DETECTED Errors)
>
> *CORRUPTION DETECTED: In redo blocks starting at block 4097count 2048 for
> thread 4 sequence 15019*
> RFS[1185]: Possible network disconnect with primary database
> *Deleted Oracle managed file
> +FR1/drdb/archivelog/2012_07_02/thread_4_seq_15019.578.787560321*
> RFS[1186]: Possible network disconnect with primary database
> Mon Jul 02 06:45:36 2012
> RFS[1189]: Assigned to RFS process 5016
> RFS[1189]: Opened log for thread 2 sequence 12872 dbid 832151255 branch
> 782279895
> *CORRUPTION DETECTED: In redo blocks starting at block 1count 2048 for
> thread 2 sequence 12872
> Deleted Oracle managed file
> +FR1/drdb/archivelog/2012_07_02/thread_2_seq_12872.578.787560337*
> Mon Jul 02 06:45:38 2012
>
>
> another thing is --  I have any another application, where there is
> dataguard from RAC to single instance. For this I dont see any problem..
>
> can anybody throw some light on this problem?
>
> Thanks in advance..
>
> Krishna
>
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>


-- 
=============================================
This Gmail Account will be deactivated  in One Months Time
=============================================


--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


Other related posts: