Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068

From: Dominic Brooks <dombrooks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "mwf@xxxxxxxx" <mwf@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2014 08:33:26 +0100

From trace files it looks like ORA-00068 is spurious and thrown by an 
underlying ORA-00600.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068
  - From: Frits Hoogland

References:
- Sort_area_size ora-0068
  - From: Dominic Brooks
- RE: Sort_area_size ora-0068
  - From: Mark W. Farnham
- Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068
  - From: Dominic Brooks
- Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068
  - From: Kim Berg Hansen
- Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068
  - From: Dominic Brooks
- RE: Sort_area_size ora-0068
  - From: Mark W. Farnham

Other related posts:

» Sort_area_size ora-0068- Dominic Brooks
» RE: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Mark W. Farnham
» Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Dominic Brooks
» Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Kim Berg Hansen
» Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Dominic Brooks
» RE: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Mark W. Farnham
» Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068 - Dominic Brooks
» Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Frits Hoogland
» RE: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Dominic Brooks
» Re: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Frits Hoogland
» RE: Sort_area_size ora-0068- Powell, Mark