RE: Solid State Disks for Databases

  • From: "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Murching, Bob" <bob_murching@xxxxxxxxx>, <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 15:47:32 -0400

Bob,

        That's part of what we're doing, a fork lift upgrade of our disk
subsystems.  Why?  Because upgrading what we had was more expensive,
especially in maintenance dollars, than replacing. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Murching, Bob [mailto:bob_murching@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2005 3:40 PM
To: 'niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx'; Goulet, Dick
Cc: 'hkchital@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'Oracle-L'
Subject: RE: Solid State Disks for Databases

"ps. $5000 for 72gb seems to come from a vendor that sells Redundant
Arrays
of Inordinately expensive Disks. Is the performance and reliability
really
better than say http://www.apple.com/xserve/raid/ ?"
 
Remember when half the country believed that Saddam Hussain personally
knocked down the NYC towers and seemingly nobody wanted to disagree?  I
think there are quite a few similar situations in storage today.

Myth: highly managed storage reduces labor cost by reducing the cost of
managing and provisioning storage.
Reality: highly managed storage often comes with a price premium that,
for
many small and medium sized businesses, more than offsets any potential
reduction in labor savings.

Myth: storage provisioning and integration are the greatest challenges
faced
by IT shops today.
Reality: performance, throughput and guaranteed performance are equally
important for many of us, but somewhere along the way that message has
gotten lost.

Myth: ROI on high-end storage is positive b/c you can upgrade the higher
end
units
Reality: price out the cost to upgrade, and often it's cheaper to just
chuck
the high end SAN or NAS and buy a new one... Make sure you're sitting
down
before asking about trade-in credit for your 12-month-old six- or
seven-figure storage solution

And yet, Apple can make a solid 5.6TB fiber-enabled box for 14 large or
whatever it is, and nobody's going to buy it because it doesn't come
with
some fancy provisioning software or a chassis whose internal components
can
be upgraded two years later for 70% of the original purchase cost.  Go
figure.

Bob
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: