Re: Shared sql area in 10g versus 9i - oracle-l - FreeLists

Re: Shared sql area in 10g versus 9i

From: Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: terrysutton@xxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 23:03:26 +0000

On 08/25/2005 01:48:24 PM, Terry Sutton wrote:
> Plus, in the case of the paper, the upgrade was from 32-bit to 64-bit.  
>
Terry, that is a great paper! I read it with pleasure.
-- 
Mladen Gogala
http://www.mgogala.com


--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

References:
- Re: Shared sql area in 10g versus 9i
  - From: Zoran Martic
- Re: Shared sql area in 10g versus 9i
  - From: Terry Sutton

Other related posts: