On 05/02/2016 12:14 AM, Jack van Zanen wrote:
Hi All,
I have two identical databases as far as versions, datasize OS etc is concerned and have a query that produces an identical execution plan.
However this part of the 10046 trace is significantly different.
The slow query is on test (first listing) and is severely constricted in its memory so my explanation would be that the tables involved are actually in the buffer cache in prod (second listing) where the sga is much larger and therefore no disk I/O is required.
I will be having a look at the buffer cache next to check what is in there
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.01 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.01 0.22 0 0 0 0
Fetch 1 3.74 65.97 30927 68453 0 0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 3 3.76 66.21 30927 68453 0 0
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.02 0 8 0 0
Execute 1 0.01 0.01 0 83 0 0
Fetch 1 0.32 0.53 0 68507 0 0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 3 0.34 0.57 0 68598 0 0
Jack van Zanen
-------------------------
This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential material for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you are not the intended recipient, please be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please contact the sender and delete all copies.
Thank you for your cooperation
