The Pope's infallibility was *officially* declared in 1870, but it was tradition long before then. And, the doctrine of infallability does not apply to everything the Pope ever says, it is only invoked under very specific situations. Here is a good link for more info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Papal_infallibility (just taught me everything I know on the subject :-) Of course, papal infallibility doesn't mean much to the majority of the world population, being non-Catholic. -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of MacGregor, Ian A. Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 9:38 AM To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: Re[2]: interview with Oracle http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/06/0630_050630_top25science.html This is a list of the 25 the top science questions. Note the reference to Descartes. Rene doubted his own existence. I'd say that tops Bishop Berkeley's musings on toppling timber. Pope's were not declared infallible until 1870. Ian MacGregor Stanford Linear Accelerator Center ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gennick Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 7:19 PM To: Dougie McGibbon Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re[2]: interview with Oracle Thursday, June 30, 2005, 4:33:02 PM, Dougie McGibbon (DMcGibbon@xxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: DM> If you were transported back into the 14th century, how would you convince DM> the pope that the Earth was round ? I was discussing this very problem with a neighbor kid today<grin>. We were actually discussing the question of whether a falling tree makes noise if no one is around to hear it, but the issue is the same. Of course the tree makes noise, and anyone who argues differently is just trying to annoy and frustrate you (though I suppose you might first need to agree on a definition for "noise"). The solution is not to argue the point at all. I don't waste energy on such arguments. Life is far less frustrating that way. It's pointless to argue with someone who already knows they are arguing for something that isn't true. The pope is infallible, so, of course, any pope in the 14th century already knew the earth was round. Were such a pope to argue that the earth was flat, he would just be trying to "get your goat", so to speak, to annoy you, and you're best off ignoring him. After all, if he's purposely arguing a position he knows is wrong, no argument you can give will change his position. That's my answer, and I'm stickin' to it :-) Best regards, Jonathan Gennick --- Brighten the corner where you are http://Gennick.com * 906.387.1698 * mailto:jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxx Join the Oracle-article list and receive one article on Oracle technologies per month by email. To join, visit http://five.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/oracle-article, or send email to Oracle-article-request@xxxxxxxxxxx and include the word "subscribe" in either the subject or body. -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l