Re: Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching

  • From: "Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco" <jreyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 09:41:43 -0400

The reason is because one by one the database gave the same problem,
all of them are similar,
and the same solution worked.
And I think anything is better than default values( specifically with this tow 
parameters),
 or I'm wrong.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jared.Still@xxxxxxxxxxx 
  To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 1:13 AM
  Subject: Re: Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching



  If I correctly understand your post, what you are saying is that 
  the init.ora parms O_I_C_A and O_I_C were set on all your 
  databases because it helped a problem on two of them. 

  This is not generally considered a good practice, that is, making 
  changes to a parameter with global implications without a specific 
  reason for doing so, and the testing to back it up. 

  I once set these parameters on a database that houses an application 
  of somewhat questionable design.  It did help, but I was really only 
  trying to fix a single query. 

  So, I put the shotgun back in the cabinet, pulled out the laser scalpal 
  and created a histogram on a single column of a single table and 
  solved the problem. 

  HTH 

  Jared 





       "Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco" <jreyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
        Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
         03/09/2004 12:25 PM 
         Please respond to oracle-l 

               
                To:        <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
                cc:         
                Subject:        Re: Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and 
optimizer_index_caching 



  I asked and this how it happened
  one database gave problem, then we found setting this parameters solved this
  problem, then we set
  them ONLY in one database
  after about one year other database had the same problem, after some months
  other,
  then we decided to set it to all at once.
  because the worload is between and oltp and a dss, we don't have to change
  it.
  That is why I suggest to set it, is better to have a more acurrate value set
  in the database. in 9.2 windows
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: <ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx>
  To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:36 AM
  Subject: Re: Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching


  > the debate on this topic is exactly why we need to keep this list going.
  Thanks for all your help guys.
  > >
  > > From: "Juan Cachito Reyes Pacheco" <jreyes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  > > Date: 2004/03/09 Tue AM 08:19:01 EST
  > > To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  > > Subject: Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
  > >
  > > I'm using, because in a specific database a query gave trouble, and I
  fixed
  > > it setting this parameters. Curiously in other production databases
  (more
  > > than 15) similar to that, didn't gave that problem.
  > > But we decided to set it any way.
  > > I think is better to set them, even when in most situation there is not
  > > problems.
  > > :)
  > >
  > > ----- Original Message ----- 
  > > From: "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  > > To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  > > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 5:01 AM
  > > Subject: RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
  > >
  > >
  > > Thanks Joze and Wolfgang
  > >
  > > I'm in a position where gathering system stats seems to me to be the
  Right
  > > Thing (tm) to do, certainly an advance on setting parameters based on
  > > guesses/measurements ahead of time. I hadn't until now seen any
  indications
  > > as to whether the feature worked as advertised or if in fact gathering
  > > system stats introduced for example unexpected and unwanted plan
  changes,
  > > curious bugs etc etc. In fact I hadn't seen *any* feedback at all which
  made
  > > me suspicious that anyone was actually using it - I guess folks recall
  the
  > > introduction of the CBO which was equally the right thing to do but..
  > >
  > > Niall Litchfield
  > > Oracle DBA
  > > Audit Commission
  > > +44 117 975 7805
  > >
  > >
  > >
  > > **********************************************************************
  > > This email contains information intended for
  > > the addressee only.  It may be confidential
  > > and may be the subject of legal and/or
  > > professional privilege.  Any dissemination,
  > > distribution, copyright or use of this
  > > communication without prior permission of
  > > the sender is strictly prohibited.
  > > **********************************************************************
  > >
  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
  > > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
  > > To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  > > put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
  > > --
  > > Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
  > > FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html 
  > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
  > >
  > >
  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
  > > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  > > ----------------------------------------------------------------
  > > To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  > > put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
  > > --
  > > Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
  > > FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
  > > -----------------------------------------------------------------
  > >
  >
  > ----------------------------------------------------------------
  > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  > ----------------------------------------------------------------
  > To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  > put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
  > --
  > Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
  > FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
  > -----------------------------------------------------------------


  ----------------------------------------------------------------
  Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
  ----------------------------------------------------------------
  To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
  --
  Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
  FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
  -----------------------------------------------------------------


Other related posts: