RE: Re: PeteFinnigan.com Oracle advisory for bugs in dbms_schedul er ( alert #68)
- From: "Powell, Mark D" <mark.powell@xxxxxxx>
- To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:14:47 -0400
Keep the top posting. I like seeing the most recent information right on
top. In most cases there is no need to scroll down through any more than
the prior post. In fact I have taken to cutting out unneeded material to
reduce the size of the messages whenever I reply. After all how many
subscribe, unsubscribe, faq lines do you need in a message?
-- Mark D Powell --
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Paul Drake
Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 10:42 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Re: PeteFinnigan.com Oracle advisory for bugs in
dbms_scheduler ( alert #68)
I'll admit, that it is mighty fast on gmail.
yahoo was a dog for oracle-l.
I can now post a hotheaded reply in mere seconds.
whether that is overall a good thing is another matter.
I don't think that I like this top-posting thing, though.
Paul
On Thu, 02 Sep 2004 18:54:48 -0700, Bricklen Anderson <bricklen@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Mladen Gogala wrote:
> > On 09/02/2004 04:16:23 PM, Jonathan Gennick wrote:
> >>Well, the whole world knows now...
> > Given the speed of this list, everybody will apply patch, before
> > they manage to get the email.
> LOL!
--
To unsubscribe - mailto:oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx&subject=unsubscribe
To search the archives - //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
Other related posts:
- » RE: Re: PeteFinnigan.com Oracle advisory for bugs in dbms_schedul er ( alert #68)
