Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- From: "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:02:47 -0000
That's nothing - I built one query that
took over 4 hours to parse. Mind you,
it was 255 tables, and rule based.
(CBO parsed it in less than a second)
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
March 2004 Hotsos Symposium - The Burden of Proof
Dynamic Sampling - an investigation
March 2004 Charlotte OUG (www.cltoug.org) CBO Tutorial
April 2004 Iceland
June 2004 UK - Optimising Oracle Seminar
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mladen Gogala" <mladen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
> Parse time over a minute? Was it a huge query or not? I find it hard to
believe.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » RE: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » RE: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » Re: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » RE: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » RE: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i
- » RE: RE: query slow in 9i, but not slow in 8i