Hi, i have tested the primary / secondary role, and i found some differences when using TAF. For example when NOT using active_instance_count, first i connect to instance A, and then i shutdown instance A. From the same session, i check that it was failed over to instance B (select * from v$instance). Then i startup instance A and shutdown instance B. It also failed over back to instance A. But when i use prim/second role, failover didn't worked. I always get error message 'shutdown in process' or 'disconnected'. So, does TAF not work in this kind of setting? The only failover that is success is for connection/logon time. regards, tomi --- Jonathan Lewis <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > The Global Resource Directory is statically > hashed between all available nodes. (Although > a cunning implementation allows it to be gradually > re-hashed when node counts change). > > This means that (on average) half the global cache > resources for your tablescan will be mastered on > the wrong node, so Oracle will need to make cross > instance calls to acquire the relevant gc locks. > > The primary/secondary implementation is a very > special case which puts the entire GRD onto just > one node, which is the node you must make available > as public node. All the GC operations will be > local, > which will have a significant effect on the > tablescan. > > The secondary node can still be used (e.g. for > large-scale > maintenance) but every operation will have always be > using remote resources, so the instance will run > more > slowly than you might expect. > > > > Regards > > Jonathan Lewis > > http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html > The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ > > http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html > Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated Sept > 19th > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "tomi wijanto" <restomi_w@xxxxxxxxx> > To: "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Friday, October 22, 2004 4:55 AM > Subject: Re: RAC problem, is gc_files_to_locks is > needed? > > > Hi, thanks for the reply.. > > i only change tnsnames to disable load balancing and > enable failover, just like you said on second > option. > All instances are up. > > Your third option is very interesting. What is the > differences from cache fusion perspective between > primary/secondary role and my way, assume all > clients > always connect to the first instance in their > tnsnames? > > regards, > tomi > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l