RE: RAC newbie question
- From: "Sais, Gene" <Gsais@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'Tom.Terrian.ctr@xxxxxxx'" <Tom.Terrian.ctr@xxxxxxx>, "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2008 14:26:44 -0400
I would spread them out, assuming you have the capacity to handle the database
load on 1 cluster.
Assuming all 3 databases are production:
Use 2 nodes (lowest capacity) as a test cluster. Use the remaining 7 nodes 2-3
clusters with 1-2 databases as the prod clusters. Trust me, you will want a
cluster to test with, RAC does NOT work as documented. There are lot's of
workarounds, especially if you are using ASM & OMF. Don't get me wrong, I
like RAC just that it is more difficult to support than Non-RAC.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Terrian, Thomas J Mr CTR DLA J6DIB
Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 2:10 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RAC newbie question
I am curious on your thoughts on this.......we have 3 unrelated
databases and 9 boxes to put them on.
Would you recommend one 9 node cluster and put them on that one or three
3 node clusters (one for each database)?
We are looking at the pros/cons of each. Does anyone have any thought
either way?
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
