Re: Question for Egenera BladeFrame
- From: Stefano Cislaghi <s.cislaghi@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kamusis@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:03:19 +0200
Hello Kamus,
I've two years experience in my old company with Egenera Bladeframe. Final
score for me is: 0 (scale 0 - 10).
Bladeframe has a lot of problems and PAN manager has a lot of bugs...
Fujitsu support really susks and also the internal knowledge about product
is really low.
Many times we have just discovered bugs, fatal bugs, and have to wait weeks
for a custom patch.
We had problem last year with internal switches that after an upgrade
stopped working with our cisco networks. Fujitsu took us 3 days of downtime
before undestand how to rollback to previous release.
We have run on it both windows and linux systems. You may installed only
certified images from Fujitsu. Linux systems usually have experienced kernel
panic. Windows instead blue screen.
In case of uprgade windows systems always loose network interface and you
have to reconfigure it.
I can go on talking for hours, but if you can, don't buy this poor product.
Stefano
On 5 August 2010 05:10, Leyi Zhang (Kamus) <kamusis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi, lists
>
> Someone is promoting Egenera Bladeframe machine to my Ct., they said
> Egenera Bladeframe is designed for high performance Oracle RAC system
> (by using PAN technology) and is cheap than IBM P-series machine when
> offer same workload.
>
> I can find some article for Egenera Bladeframe as below:
> http://www.egenera.com/products-bladeframe.htm
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egenera#Bladeframe
>
> But I'm wonder is there any guy here has real experience with Egenera
> Bladeframe? How about this machine for Oracle RAC performance
> increasing in the real OLTP production system?
>
> --
> Kamus <kamusis@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Visit my blog for more : http://www.dbform.com
> Join ACOUG: http://www.acoug.org
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
http://www.stefanocislaghi.eu
Other related posts:
