Re: Question about Append hint in Insert

  • From: "jaromir nemec" <jaromir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:23:23 +0200

Hi,



I agree that the unique constraint on non-unique index is practicable
solution for the insert /*+ append */ scenario described above.

Are there some other problems, overheads etc. additional to the fact, that
the non-unique index allocates more space (additional ROWID in each index
entry) as the unique index with the same indexed columns?

thanks

Jaromir D.B. Nemec


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bobak, Mark" <Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2004 5:39 AM
Subject: RE: Question about Append hint in Insert


> Good point.  That's why I like to have non-unique indexes supporting
> my unique constraints.


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: