QFS-CFS or ASM for RAC Deployment in Production ?

  • From: VIVEK_SHARMA <VIVEK_SHARMA@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2007 03:15:14 +0530


For subsequent RAC Deployment in ver 10gR2, A Banking customer needs to take a 
decision on use of QFS Cluster file system versus ASM?

Prima-facie, How do the 2 compare in terms of Performance, scalability, 
availability, migration, ease of use, backups, need for training etc.

Currently Production Deployment info:-

 *   NON-RAC with Oracle ver 9.2,
 *   Solaris 10.
 *   Database size if 5 TB approx.
 *   Daily peak load of 20,000 Concurrent sessions connecting to the Database 
via Shared Servers (MTS).
 *   Database exists on the default Unix File system (UFS),
 *   Machine - SF25K SUN Server.
 *   Storage Box - Sun Store Edge 9980 V

Any Docs, Links will help.

Cheers & thanks


**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely 
for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please 
notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are 
not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other 
person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. 
Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not 
liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. 
You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or 
attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all 
messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this 
e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***

Other related posts:

  • » QFS-CFS or ASM for RAC Deployment in Production ?