Re: Oracle Expert
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2004 13:29:23 +0100
Comments in-line
On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 11:20:58 +0200, Mogens Nørgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> And just to set the license record straight:
>
> Yes, you pay either $60 per Named User Plus license or $3000 per CPU
> license for each of the OEM Packs. That's always been the case.
With the rather important caveat that you pay for them on the same
basis that you pay for the DBMS. 8 processor licence for EE implies 8
processor license for each pack that you take).
And I've never really understood the rationale behind this (other than
the give us more cash rationale) - with the possible but unlikely
exception of Change Management. It seems to me that performance tuning
and monitoring are done by one or more DBAs, but per database/instance
not per user or per processor. I'd be far happier with a flat price,
or a price per monitored target.
> With 10g there's a new twist, since some of the really cool performance
> and patch features in that relase can only be used if you buy the OEM
> Packs.
>
> In short, AWR, ADDM, ASH, Advisors, etc. on the performance side must
> only be used if you have purchased both the Performance and Tuning
> packs.
And that seems to include rolling it all yourself by writing scripts
etc against the exposed views. IMO that should mean that the views
only get installed when you install the pack! In addition Oracle
always used to include a Standard Management pack, which wasn't that
much use, but it allows you to use the event test and alert system
with your own scripts (and some predefined tests as well). I haven't
done that much looking at 10g EM yet (work keeps getting in the way
and I have something else cool to do on the train now) but this
functionality seems to have gone. Now my Oracle Sales rep tells us
that no functionality that was there in 9i will have been taken away
in 10g but I'm still waiting to hear if he or anyone else in Oracle
can find it. And yes I am peeved - if the self managing database means
the added chargeable extras database this is not a step forward .
> It makes the packs much more useful. It also makes Oracle more
> expensive, which will hinder the sales of these packs.
And provides a great market for tools and consultancy companies.
> As for the historic facet: Yes, they came from the Rdb world, and they
> (expecially the DEC Expert product) would deliver reports several
> hundred pages long where each parameter setting, and all sorts of other
> in-conclusive data, were presented to the great bewilderment (but often
> satisfaction) of the customer/end-user.
LOL
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
