Re: Oracle 9.2.0.5 "10046" Tracing Causes Server Crash on Windows 2000?
- From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 20:28:41 +0300
> The tables are not partitioned but we are using RAID 10 striped and =
> mirrored. Are parallel and partitioning 'locked' together? Is their no =
> value to parallel unless the tables are partitioned? We are moving =
> toward it but haven't done it yet.=20
No, parallel and partitioning are NOT locked together. However, in some
cases, using parallel operations on partitioned objects can give additional
benefit (partition-wise joins etc..)
Tanel.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
