Re: Ora-600 on 10.1.0.3 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 3))
- From: Adam Donahue <adonahue@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Parker, Matthew" <matthewp@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 15:21:27 -0800
The hidden parameter did the trick -- I forgot that the Metalink main
search doesn't query bugs. I'm being stupid today. I should report to
Oracle that this issue persists on 10.1.0.3.
Adam
Parker, Matthew wrote:
>Check out
>Note:285906.1
>And previous bug for 10.1.0.2 (3599503).
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>Behalf Of Adam Donahue
>Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 2:54 PM
>To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Ora-600 on 10.1.0.3 (Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon
>Update 3))
>
>Folks,
>
>We're encountering an ora-600 from the following statement, run in against a
>10g database:
>
>ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [qctVCO:csform], [0], [0], [0],
>[0], [1], [1], [0]
>
>Anyone seen this? It happens when we issue an update with a two-level
>subselect as part of the column list, e.g., update tab set col = ( select ...
>where col2 in ( select ... ) ) ) (not correlated). I'll send more SQL if
>anyone can confirm they've seen the issue. (Can't really send it as-is for
>security reasons.)
>
>I've searched Metalink, the ORA-600 lookup tool, Google and some other sources
>to no avail.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam
>
>
>
>--
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
