RE: MTS versus dedicated for resolving a ORA-04031.
- From: Stephen.Lee@xxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 08:36:24 -0600
I think you need to patch to the latest 9.2.0.4 level of Oracle. Earlier
versions of 9 had did not correctly manage the SGA. We round and round with
the 4031 until Oracle finally, at L-O-N-G last, recognized there was a
problem and fixed it.
> -----Original Message-----
>
> We have upgraded our databases from 8174 to 9203.
>
> We have started encountering ORA-04031's on processes that
> are using MTS. Once we switch that process to use a
> dedicated connection then the problem goes away. This
> problem did not occur when we were using 8174.
>
> For 8174, the shared pool was 100M. Large pool = 0. reserved is 10%.
> For 9203, the shared pool was doubled to 200M. Large pool =
> 0. reserved is 10%.
>
> Any thoughts?? Are we killing ourselves by doubling the
> shared pool?? Does everyone else set their large pool to zero???
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
